全國甲卷

向Chris介紹中國歷史人物。

注意：

      1. 詞數(shù) 100 左右；

      2. 可以適當(dāng)增加細(xì)節(jié)，以使行文連貫。

Dear Chris,

Yours, 

Li Hua

全國乙卷

假期所學(xué)到的新技能

      1. 學(xué)的新技能是什么；

      2. 分享心得感悟。

注意：

      1. 詞數(shù) 100 左右；

      2. 題目和首句已為你寫好。

新高考I卷、II卷

Dear teacher,

I think it's not a good idea to randomly pair up students for the spoken English training class. I have a few reasons for my opinion.

Firstly, randomly pairing up students may lead to imbalanced language abilities within the groups. Some students might have advanced speaking skills while others may struggle with basic conversation. This can hinder the progress of both students as the more advanced one may dominate the conversation, leaving little room for the other student to improve.

Secondly, students may feel uncomfortable or less motivated if they are paired with someone they don't get along with or have difficulty communicating with. Building a positive and comfortable learning environment is crucial for effective language practice, and randomly assigning pairs might undermine this.

Instead, I suggest implementing a system where students can choose their own partners based on their language abilities and personal preferences. This allows students to collaborate with someone they are comfortable with, ensuring a supportive and productive learning environment.

Yours,

Li hua

北京卷

假定你是李華，你校外教Ryan要舉辦口語培訓(xùn)班，將練習(xí)口語的所有學(xué)生隨機(jī)挑選兩個(gè)人分成一組練習(xí)，你對此有意見，向外教寫一封郵件，內(nèi)容如下：

1、說明問題，

2、提出建議。

注意：詞數(shù)80左右

開頭和結(jié)尾已經(jīng)給出。不計(jì)入總詞數(shù)。

Dear Ryan,

  I am Lihua, one of your students. ________________

Yours，

Li Hua

Dear Ryan,

I am Li Hua, one of your students. Regarding the grouping method for the oral training course, I would like to raise some concerns and suggestions. While it is true that randomly mixing up students can encourage more communication and interaction, there may also be some potential issues to consider.

Firstly, random grouping can result in students with vastly different speaking abilities being paired together. This may make some students with stronger communication skills feel inhibited, while those with weaker speaking skills may feel overwhelmed. Additionally, some students may feel uneasy and uncomfortable having to work with unfamiliar classmates.

Therefore, I suggest that a more thoughtful grouping method be adopted, such as grouping students according to their exam grades, verbal performance, or interests. This would allow each student to practice their spoken English with peers who are of a similar proficiency level, and ones with similar interests, which would serve to enhance student motivation and confidence. This approach also ensures that students with varying abilities have opportunities to develop their language skills.

I hope that my suggestions will be considered. Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,

Li Hua

Dear Ryan,

My name is Li Hua, one of your esteemed students. I write to express my opinion concerning the grouping strategy proposed by you for the oral training course. While it may be true that random pairing of students can foster greater interaction and communication, there are potential drawbacks to consider.

Caution must be exercised in randomly grouping students, particularly in a scenario where their communication abilities vastly differ. It may lead to a situation where high-level communicators feel violated and inhibited, while those lacking are bogged down by the overwhelming challenges of the class. In addition, some students may feel uneasy working with unfamiliar classmates.

With this in mind, I propose that a thoughtful grouping strategy be adopted, albeit grouping students according to their exam scores, verbal proficiency or individual interests. This, in turn, ensures that every student can practice speaking English with like-minded peers, thereby boosting their motivation and confidence. More importantly, it guarantees that students with varying communication abilities have equal opportunities to develop their language skills.

It is my fervent hope that my suggestions would gain approval, and taken into account. I thank you for your unwavering attention.

Yours sincerely,

Li Hua

Dear Ryan

I think it's not a good idea to randomly pair up students for the spoken English training class. I have a few reasons for my opinion.

Firstly, randomly pairing up students may lead to imbalanced language abilities within the groups. Some students might have advanced speaking skills while others may struggle with basic conversation. This can hinder the progress of both students as the more advanced one may dominate the conversation, leaving little room for the other student to improve.

Secondly, students may feel uncomfortable or less motivated if they are paired with someone they don't get along with or have difficulty communicating with. Building a positive and comfortable learning environment is crucial for effective language practice, and randomly assigning pairs might undermine this.

Instead, I suggest implementing a system where students can choose their own partners based on their language abilities and personal preferences. This allows students to collaborate with someone they are comfortable with, ensuring a supportive and productive learning environment.

Yours,

Li hua

Dear Ryan

I am your student, Li Hua. I have some questions and suggestions regarding the grouping of students in the oral training class. While random grouping can encourage communication and interaction to some extent, there may be potential problems.

Firstly, students with significant differences in speaking skills may be grouped together, which may make stronger speakers feel restrained and weaker speakers feel overwhelmed. Moreover, some students may feel uneasy and constrained when paired with unfamiliar classmates.

Therefore, I suggest adopting a more reasonable grouping method, such as grouping students based on their exam scores, speaking ability, or interests. This would allow each student to practice speaking English with peers at a similar level and shared interests, boosting their motivation and confidence, and promoting mutual improvement among all levels of students.

I hope my suggestions will be accepted. Thank you!

Best regards,

Li Hua